Keep the colleague's microbu-esp32c5 tree in this repository
obu-firmware builds against vanetza-idf from microbu-esp32c5/external, but that tree was gitignored, so a clone of this repository could not build the firmware it ships. It is now committed here as ordinary files in its own folder, microbu-esp32c5/: the colleague's commit cf4b99f plus the V2X2MAP bridge's signature verification (--trust) used on the bench. Nothing is fetched from or pushed to the colleague's repository; this repository and its remotes carry everything. The folder's own .gitignore keeps build output, downloaded components and private key material out, as it did there; the committed file set is identical to that repository's tracked files. The ESP32-C5 is still flashed from obu-firmware/, which only takes vanetza-idf from microbu-esp32c5/, so the two stay separate folders. FLASHING.md says how to take a newer version of the colleague's tree (copy it over the folder, rebuild, test, commit).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
find_path(COHDA_ROOT
|
||||
NAMES "ieee1609/app/lib1609/include/lib1609.h" "cohda/kernel/include/linux/cohda/llc/llc-api.h"
|
||||
PATHS "/home/duser"
|
||||
PATH_SUFFIXES mk5 mk2
|
||||
CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_BOTH
|
||||
DOC "Cohda SDK")
|
||||
|
||||
set(COHDA_KERNEL_INCLUDE_DIR ${COHDA_ROOT}/ieee1609/kernel/include)
|
||||
set(COHDA_LIB1609_INCLUDE_DIR ${COHDA_ROOT}/ieee1609/app/lib1609/include)
|
||||
set(COHDA_LLC_INCLUDE_DIR ${COHDA_ROOT}/cohda/kernel/include/linux/cohda/llc)
|
||||
set(COHDA_INCLUDE_DIRS ${COHDA_KERNEL_INCLUDE_DIR} ${COHDA_LIB1609_INCLUDE_DIR} ${COHDA_LLC_INCLUDE_DIR})
|
||||
|
||||
include(FindPackageHandleStandardArgs)
|
||||
find_package_handle_standard_args(Cohda "Cohda SDK not found" COHDA_ROOT)
|
||||
mark_as_advanced(COHDA_ROOT)
|
||||
if(COHDA_FOUND AND NOT TARGET Cohda::headers)
|
||||
add_library(Cohda::headers UNKNOWN IMPORTED)
|
||||
set_target_properties(Cohda::headers PROPERTIES
|
||||
INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES "${COHDA_INCLUDE_DIRS}")
|
||||
endif()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user